The short answer: Visa's Merchant Elevated Risk Program (MERP) identifies individual merchants in Asia-Pacific whose activity shows elevated risk — early, before their volumes are large enough to trip portfolio-level monitoring programs. Visa evaluates several signals together and does not publish the thresholds it uses, so there is no MERP number you can calculate your way under. What you can do is watch the signals themselves: fraud and dispute rates, decline rates, and abnormal spikes in activity, especially on new accounts or new product lines.
MERP is Visa's program for spotting deceptive or high-risk merchant activity in the Asia-Pacific region. Visa's Singapore Security Roadmap describes its aim plainly: to target objective elevated merchant-risk activity and offer an avenue for liability reversal and reimbursement for issuers and cardholders, concentrating on high-confidence cases of deceptive activity that show up as smaller-scale, disproportionate fraud or dispute rates or abnormal spikes in activity. Its stated goals include identifying merchants whose fraud and dispute rates, decline rates or abnormal spikes demonstrate excessive risk, and improving acquirer controls and oversight.
One date needs care. Visa's April 2026 Core Rules introduced MERP for the AP region, effective 9 April 2026, with the identification and non-compliance rules sitting in sections 10.4.4.4 and 12.5.8.1 of that edition. Stripe's monitoring documentation, the version most Stripe merchants actually encounter, describes MERP as effective October 2026 for businesses accepting Visa in Asia-Pacific. Treat October 2026 as the enforcement wave merchants are feeling now, and the April 2026 rulebook as the program's origin — not as two different programs. If your acquirer cites MERP, ask which notice and date it is relying on.
Stripe's monitoring documentation lists the signals Visa considers when identifying a business under MERP, and stresses that Visa evaluates them together rather than against individual thresholds. No single figure below is a published tripwire — that is the whole point of the program, and any article quoting a MERP threshold as fact is inventing it:
Visa's own framing adds the pattern that ties these together: disproportionate rates at small scale, and abnormal spikes. A new account or a new product line doing modest volume with a high fraud or dispute rate is exactly the profile MERP was built to catch early — before the merchant is big enough for a portfolio program to notice.
Stripe's documentation describes the sequence: Visa notifies Stripe when it identifies a business under MERP, and if the account is still active, Stripe contacts the merchant. Response timelines are short, so a slow reply can cost the chance to contest the identification. If Visa confirms it, the consequences can include:
Under Visa's April 2026 rules, acquirers that fail to refute an identification face non-compliance assessments and Dispute Condition 10.5 (Visa Fraud Monitoring Program) on eligible transactions. That is why your acquirer has its own strong incentive to act fast — and why a merchant that answers quickly, with evidence, is in a better position than one that waits.
Three different yardsticks, three different jobs:
The practical reading: VAMP is the line you can compute, Stripe's 0.75% is the line your processor watches, and MERP is the judgement call Visa makes on your pattern. A merchant watching only one of the three is exposed on the other two.
No. Visa does not publish MERP thresholds, and Stripe's documentation states explicitly that Visa evaluates the signals together rather than against individual thresholds. Any source quoting a MERP percentage as fact is guessing. Watch the signals — fraud rate, dispute rate, decline rate and spikes — instead of chasing a number.
No. VAMP's Excessive tier needs 1.5% plus at least 1,500 counted events in a month. MERP is designed to catch elevated risk before volumes reach that scale, evaluating one merchant at a time. A clean VAMP report says nothing about MERP.
Visa notifies your processor, which contacts you if the account is still active. If confirmed, consequences can include non-compliance assessments passed through to you, backdated fraud disputes for earlier transactions, a required remediation plan, and in some circumstances account closure. Respond promptly and in writing — timelines are short.
Yes — that is its design. MERP targets smaller-scale, disproportionate fraud and dispute rates and abnormal spikes, evaluated merchant by merchant, rather than waiting for portfolio-level volumes. Small volume with a high rate is the profile it was built for, especially on new accounts and product lines.
Sources (checked October 27, 2026): Stripe, “Dispute and fraud card monitoring programs” (docs.stripe.com/disputes/monitoring-programs) for MERP’s signals, unpublished thresholds and identification outcomes; Stripe, “Measuring disputes” (docs.stripe.com/disputes/measuring) for the 0.75% excessive-activity marker; Visa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service Rules, April 2026 edition, sections 10.4.4.4 and 12.5.8.1 (MERP — AP Region, effective 9 April 2026); Visa Singapore Security Roadmap 2026 and Beyond (MERP’s purpose and risk pattern); Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program fact sheet as summarised by Chargeflow and Dodo Payments for the 1.5% / 1,500 VAMP Excessive criteria effective 1 April 2026.
This guide is general information only — not legal or financial advice. Last updated: October 27, 2026.