For course and coaching sellers: a student or coachee chargebacked — what evidence answers THIS allegation? A shipment-tracking pack will not save a digital sale, and a signed agreement alone proves nothing about delivery. Pick the allegation on your processor notice and get the pack for it: provisioning, access logs, and session attendance for “never got it”; the purchase-time promise next to the curriculum actually delivered for “not as described”; the terms, renewal notice, and cancellation log for “I cancelled but was charged again.” No outcome is promised — the issuing bank decides — and the deadline on your own processor notice governs; this tool states no deadline in days.
Private by design — everything runs in your browser. Nothing is uploaded.
The same course sale needs a different pack for each claim. A delivery photo wins a “never arrived” dispute and is barely relevant to a “not as described” dispute; a device fingerprint answers a fraud dispute and is irrelevant to a credit dispute. This builder applies that rule to coaching, where the delivery proof is attendance and access, not a parcel:
| Allegation | Codes | Core proof (this builder) |
|---|---|---|
| Not delivered | Visa 13.1 · Mastercard 4853 (not-provided sub-condition) | Provisioning + dated access log or session attendance for this buyer account. |
| Not as described | Visa 13.3 · Mastercard 4853 (not-as-described sub-condition) | Purchase-time sales page next to the curriculum and deliverables actually provided. |
| Cancelled recurring | Visa 13.2 · Mastercard 4853 (recurring sub-condition) | Signup terms, renewal notice, cancellation log, and usage after the claimed date. |
| Credit not processed | Visa 13.6 · Mastercard 4853 (credit-not-processed sub-condition) | Refund ledger for this exact payment, with the purchase-time refund policy. |
A signed coaching agreement proves the buyer accepted your terms. It does not prove a single session happened, a single lesson was watched, or access was ever granted. Every pack in this builder therefore treats the agreement as context, never as a must-have delivery exhibit — and if the agreement is the only thing you hold, the builder says so and calls the pack a gap. Pair it with provisioning, access, or attendance records, or do not lead with it.
Three existing builders cover adjacent ground, and none of them routes a coaching case by allegation with attendance and access evidence. The Shopify Chargeback Evidence Checker is built around physical fulfilment — carrier tracking, delivery scans, and shipped-product listings. The Square Dispute Response Builder is a generic seller builder framed by Square’s fraud / non-fraud split and its dashboard window. The PayPal Seller Dispute Response Builder is built around PayPal’s own claim types and Seller Protection verdicts. This builder is the coaching-specific one: no tracking number is asked for, session attendance and lesson progress replace delivery scans, and the pack changes with the allegation rather than with the platform. For the buyer’s side of the same dispute, see the generic Evidence Checklist Builder and the not-as-described evidence guide — this page is written for the seller, and its copy is not shared with any consumer page.
First, the final-submission trap: on Stripe a submitted dispute response is final and cannot be supplemented, so review the completed packet — including the gap you could not fill — before sending. Second, the deadline trap: your processor notice carries the deadline that governs your case. This page deliberately states no deadline in days, because network maximums and processor deadlines differ and published figures conflict; use the date on your own notice, and treat any guide that gives you a single number for every case as unverified.
Allegation-by-allegation packs, the payment-to-entitlement-to-usage chain, the cancellation-timeline test, the PayPal intangible-goods limits, and the refund-first rule — with the builder above the fold.
Sources (verified November 2, 2026): Visa codes 13.1 / 13.2 / 13.3 / 13.6 — Merchant Fraud Journal, “How to Write a Chargeback Rebuttal Letter” (code-to-evidence rebuttal table) and Sift, “Visa Chargeback Reason Codes”; Mastercard 4853 catch-all and sub-conditions, retired 4855 folded into 4853 — Chargeback Clock’s Mastercard reason-code guide and Chargeflow, “Mastercard Chargeback Reason Codes” (October 2026); Stripe dispute-evidence fields access_activity_log, service_documentation, receipt, customer_communication, cancellation_policy — Stripe DisputeEvidence object reference, and Chargeflow, “Stripe Digital Goods Dispute Evidence” and “What Evidence Do I Need to Win a Stripe Chargeback” (both October 12, 2026); PayPal Seller Protection Program (last updated January 26, 2026, paypal.com) for the intangible-goods limits; Square Support article 7891 service-evidence list (April 23, 2026), as recorded in Chargeback Clock’s Square dispute guide (October 31, 2026). Your processor notice and account agreement govern your case.