The short answer: the label does not decide it β the trigger does. If a fee appears only because you paid by card (or is higher for card payments), it is a card surcharge by another name, and since 1 October 2026 the major card networks' no-surcharge rules ban it. If every customer pays the same booking, service, or weekend fee however they pay, it is a genuine fee and remains legal β provided it is disclosed and, where it can be calculated in advance, included in the advertised total price. Ask the business first; the evidence is your receipt.
The Reserve Bank's review of retail payments regulation concluded in March 2026 by removing its prohibition on card networks having no-surcharge rules. The networks then wrote those rules themselves: from 1 October 2026, eftpos, Visa, Mastercard, and American Express do not allow businesses to add a surcharge for paying by card (credit, debit, or prepaid). The ban is therefore a network rule enforced through the business's agreement with its payment provider, not a statute the ACCC enforces case by case. The ACCC's remaining role is misleading pricing under the Australian Consumer Law β including a card surcharge dressed up under another name.
The old rule applied: a surcharge could not exceed the business's cost of accepting that card type. The Reserve Bank's 2023 figures put typical acceptance costs at about 0.4% for debit, 0.8% for credit, and 1.3% for charge cards β so a pre-October surcharge well above those levels was excessive under the old regime. Do not quote the old cost cap for a payment made after 1 October 2026; after that date, any card-triggered fee is banned regardless of size.
Yes, if every customer pays it however they pay. A booking fee becomes a disguised surcharge only when it is triggered by paying by card.
Yes. Weekend and public-holiday surcharges are unrelated to payment method and were never covered by the card-surcharge rules.
The ACCC's position is that renaming does not change the substance: a fee triggered by card payment may amount to misleading conduct. The receipt β showing the fee appears only for card payments β is the evidence.
No. The ACCC does not resolve individual pricing complaints. Ask the business first, then use the network/bank route for the individual amount.
Sources (checked November 2, 2026): Reserve Bank of Australia, Review of Retail Payments Regulation conclusions paper FAQs (no-surcharge rules from 1 October 2026 for eftpos, Visa, Mastercard; Amex also removed surcharging; applies to payments made on or after 1 October 2026 even on earlier invoices); ACCC card-surcharge guidance (service/booking fees unaffected if separate from the payment method; a card surcharge described as another fee may be misleading conduct; ACCC does not resolve individual pricing complaints); ACCC price-display rules (unavoidable, calculable fees in the single total price). Pre-October cost figures are the RBA's 2023 typical acceptance costs, labelled as such.
This guide is general information only β not legal or financial advice. Last updated: November 2, 2026.