A customer chargebacked your repair bill — what evidence answers THIS allegation? A price-gap claim is not answered by photos, and a faulty-repair claim is not answered by an invoice. Pick the allegation on your processor notice and this builder routes you to the exact pack: the signed estimate plus authorization for extras when the final bill ran over the estimate, the signed work order when work is called unauthorized, and before/after photos plus warranty terms when the repair is called faulty. No win is promised, and no response deadline in days is stated anywhere on this page — the date on your own processor notice governs.
Private by design — everything runs in your browser.
Every chargeback notice carries a reason code and an allegation, and the bank judges your evidence against that allegation. Sending the whole filing cabinet helps nobody: a delivery proof does not answer a quality claim, and a signed estimate does not answer a faulty repair. The table below is the whole router — find your row, and that row is your pack.
| Allegation on the notice | Network codes | Lead evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Final bill higher than the estimate | Visa 13.3 · Mastercard 4853 (not as described) | Signed estimate + signed authorization for every dollar above it, obtained before that work was done + final invoice traced line by line |
| Work never authorized | Visa 13.3 · Mastercard 4853 (not as described) | Signed work order + one authorization record per disputed line; lines without a record are conceded, not argued |
| Faulty repair | Visa 13.3 · Mastercard 4853 (defective) | Dated before/after photos + warranty terms as given to this customer + written re-inspection or re-repair offer and the reply |
| Work never done | Visa 13.1 · Mastercard 4853 (not provided) | Technician completion record + signed pickup record + signed work order |
| Refund promised, never received | Visa 13.6 · Mastercard 4853 (credit not processed) | Refund ledger for this payment against the promise; if promised and never issued, refund first |
| Payment itself unauthorized | Visa 10.4 · Mastercard 4837 (fraud) | Routed out — needs identity and authentication evidence, not a repair pack |
First, the invoice trap: an invoice proves a charge exists. It does not prove the work was authorized, and it does not prove the work was good. A pack built on the invoice alone is a gap, not a pack. Second, the after-the-fact authorization: an authorization dated after the extra work was done is not an authorization — California's rule (Business and Professions Code 9884.9(a)) states the principle plainly for California shops, and the same logic is what a reviewer applies anywhere: consent must come before the work it covers. Third, the lien trap: a chargeback response is not the place for a lien threat, and a vehicle repairer's lien is state law with state-by-state rules — including, in possessory-lien states, that voluntarily returning the vehicle can end the lien. Keep the lien question entirely separate from the chargeback response, and get state-specific advice before acting on it.
No response deadline in days: processor deadlines conflict across sources, so the tool counts days only from a date you copy from your own processor notice. No national estimate rule: the California estimate-and-authorization rule is cited as a California example only — other states have their own repair laws, and the tool never presents it as a national rule. No mechanic's-lien timeline, fee, notice period, or sale rule for any state. No win rate, no fee figure, no outcome promise: the bank decides on the reason code and the records. No customer-facing advice: the consumer side of this dispute is the companion checker linked below.
The allegation router worked through with examples, the California estimate rule and its limits, the lien warning in full, and a representment outline you can draft from — with the builder above the fold.
Sources (verified November 3, 2026): Visa 13.3 / 13.1 / 13.6 / 13.7 meanings and evidence — Chargeflow Visa 2026 reason-code list, Chargeback Gurus Visa 13.3 guide, Chargebacks911 Visa 13.3 guide, DisputeLock reason-code guide, Antom Visa dispute guidance; Mastercard 4853 catch-all and sub-conditions — Sift Mastercard reason-code list, Chargeback.io Mastercard guide, Chargeflow evidence matrix; Stripe service evidence (signed contract / work order as service documentation) — Stripe Docs dispute categories and best practices; service-shop evidence shape (approved estimates, signed work orders, itemized invoices, before/after photos, service logs, approval messages) — LMN Help Center Payment Disputes (updated October 20, 2026); California estimate + authorization rule — California Business and Professions Code 9884.9(a), California BAR Repairs and services / Write It Right guide; mechanic's lien is state law — Credit Karma mechanic's lien guide, LegalClarity lien guide. Your processor notice governs your deadline and your reason code.
Customer side of this dispute: Auto Repair Dispute Checker (consumer checker — linked regardless of its build status; see the build report if it is not yet live).